MittenFacedLass

The Maersk case is cracking me up.

What the hell is going on here. If they were going to bring this over, why do it like this?

I think an unlocked or maybe 40 fps mode on Pro might be possible? Hard to say though. We haven't even seen any actual gameplay. It's hard to predict based on that.

@wsjudd it happens! Get some rest!

Uh, isn't the US price 79.99?

Is there any reason you think 120hz support is unlikely? VRR I can sort of understand since that requires extra effort on PS5 to do properly, but considering the age of the games, 120fps seems pretty doable even at high resolutions, especially presuming these are ports of the PC versions and using a modern PS SDK version?
Based on PC Gaming Wiki, seems like high fps in the Campaign might not be viable, but seems like multiplayer should be no issue.

How does one vote in the poll? It just shows the results already and no option to vote?

Is there a particular reason the screenshots are so low-res in this article?
Don't really do the trailer justice.

Somewhat confused by this headline. Haven't they produced RAM before...?

This is remarkably disappointing. Smh.

@themightyant To be fair, as far as open-worlds go, this is a relatively restrained game compared to some. This is from the era of AC when the games were usually about 30 hours, maybe a bit more, rather than 100.

41% of respondents*

Definitely an increase in resolved detail, though oddly inconsistent.

For some reason having both ultra, cinematic, and max is weird to me. It's just a naming thing, but it's odd.

@Spodlude Windows HDR unfortunately tends to be pretty broken.

It looks like PS5's performance mode disables displacement mapping? That's a pretty big loss.